AMIT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-4(1), PATNA, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lower authorities passed ex-parte orders without providing proper opportunity to the assessee and without verifying service of notices, violating principles of natural justice. The assessment also erroneously considered the entire sale proceeds as STCG without accounting for acquisition and improvement costs.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened based on information regarding the sale of immovable property for Rs. 52,49,000. Despite notices, the assessee did not respond, leading to an ex-parte assessment order treating the entire sale proceeds as short-term capital gain.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment and appellate orders were passed without affording proper opportunity to the assessee and violating natural justice. Whether the entire sale proceeds were correctly treated as short-term capital gain without considering costs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, PATNA
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)] dated 26.12.2025, DIN & order No.
2 Amit Kumar; AY 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1084129066(1) on the following grounds of appeal: -
“1. For that, on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the order of assessment because the assessing officer has passed the ex-parte order without providing proper opportunity.
For that, on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) fur
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026