HIM PROPERTIES & DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT/ACIT, LUCKNOW
What were the facts?
The assessee received share application money of ₹44,96,000/-. The Assessing Officer treated this as income from other sources under section 56(1) due to the assessee's inability to produce records and lack of clarity on the source and nature of the funds. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It noted that if the share application money was introduced in previous years, it could not be taxed in the current year. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration.
What were the issues?
Whether share application money, if introduced in prior years, can be taxed as income in the current year, and whether the CIT(A)'s order was non-speaking.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW ‘B’ BENCH, LUCKNOW
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 3.01.2025, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeals of the assessee against the orders passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) for the A.Y. 2016-17 on 6.12.2018. The grounds of appeal are as under: - “1. That the learned Commissioner (Appeals) erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition by treating the share application money of ₹ 44,96,000/- as income under section 56(1) of the Income-tax Act, despite the assessee having consistently disclosed the amount as share application money p
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 56(1)
- Sindhu Farms Pvt Ltd, Gurugram vs DCIT, RohtakITA 8194/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Premal P Pandya, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 195/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 May 2026AY 2022-23
- Afzal Ahmad, Lucknow vs Faceless Assessment Unint, NFACITA 265/LKW/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Ashok Gupta, Yamuna Nagar vs Ward 52(5), New DelhiITA 8457/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Feb 2026AY 2012-13
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Roselife Enclave LLP, KolkataITA 1666/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: Disposed10 Feb 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026