TATOBA RAGHUNATH GEND,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 3, SATARA, SATARA
What were the facts?
The assessees, ex-employees of BSNL, received compensation under the BSNL VRS-2019 scheme. They initially offered a portion of this compensation to tax after claiming exemption under Section 10(10C) but later sought full exemption under Section 10(10B).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL VRS-2019 scheme is in the nature of retrenchment compensation and is fully exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The assessees are directed to file revised computations to claim this exemption and any resultant refund.
What were the issues?
Whether compensation received under the BSNL VRS-2019 scheme is taxable or exempt under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Sr ITA No.
Appellant Respondent Date of A.Y.
No order of the Addl / JCIT(A)s 1 2090/PUN/2026 Sanjay Bajarang Todali ITO, Ward 16.03.2026 2020-21 C/o Padvekar Law 1(1), Chambers, 408, Maker Kolhapur Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai – 400020 PAN: AAHPT1430E 2 2091/PUN/2026 -do- -do- 16.03.2026 2021-22 3 2092/PUN/2026 Prakash Shivmurti ITO, Ward 04.03.2026 2020-21 Sakharshete 2(1), Solapur C/o Padvekar Law Chambers, 408, Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai – 400020 PAN: AYAPS4616C 4 2093/PUN/2026 -do- 16.03.2026 2021-22 -do- 5 2094/PUN/2026 Parashuram Jotiram ITO, Ward 03.03.2026 2020-21 Jathar 1(1), C/o Padvekar Law Kolhapur Chambers, 408, Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai – 400020 PAN: AFQPJ2754P 6 2095/PUN/2026 -do- -do- 03.03.2026 2021-22 7 2096/PUN/2026 Bharat Ramchandra ITO, Ward 16.03.2026 2020-21 Kumbhar 13(2), Pune C/o Padvekar Law Chambers, 408, Maker Bhavan No.3, 21, New Marine Lines, Mumbai – 400020 PAN: ABTPK0914H 8 2097/PUN/2026 -do- -do- 03.03.2026 2021-22 9 2101/PUN/2026 Balnath Bhaskar ITO, Ward 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026