DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE vs. BHATE & RAJE CONSTRUCTION CO PRIVATE LIMITED , PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee company entered into specified domestic transactions with associated enterprises. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) accepted these transactions as being at Arm's Length. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) initiated penalty proceedings under Sections 271AA and 271G of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271AA was not maintainable as the AO did not specify which documents were not maintained by the assessee and the TPO had already accepted the transactions as Arm's Length. Similarly, the penalty under Section 271G was also held to be not maintainable, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of this penalty by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether penalties under Section 271AA and 271G are leviable when the primary transactions are accepted as Arm's Length and the specific documents allegedly not maintained are not identified. The applicability of omitted provisions related to Specified Domestic Transactions was also considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “C”, PUNE
Before: SHRI Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, A.M : These two appeals are filed by both the Assessee and Revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune-13 [Ld.CIT(A)], passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for AY 2014-15 on 24-11-2025, emanating from the penalty orders 271AA, dated 29-06-2018 and 271G, dt. 29-06-2018. Since the facts
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271AA
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Concept Medical Research Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle 1(1)(1), SuratITTPA 1/SRT/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Sasa Stone Private Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle6(1)(1), Bmtc Building…ITA 1598/BANG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Sasa Stone Private Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT Circle 6(1)(1), Bmtc Building…ITA 1597/BANG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Bbc Global News India Private Limited, New… vs DCIT, Central Circle-8, New DelhiITA 4460/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026