DEOVRAT ,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 4(1), PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without hearing the assessee and did not decide all grounds on merits. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed without providing an opportunity of being heard. The assessee contended that this violated principles of natural justice. The ITAT noted the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without hearing the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee, thus violating principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 19.12.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act on 15.03.2023 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 15.03.2023, Assessee filed an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide Order dated 19.12.2025, dismissed the Appeal of the Deovrat; A.Y: 2018-19 Assessee. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 19.12.2025, Assessee fi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026