JEETENDRA KUMAR GUPTA,LOKE NATH NAGAR, BAGDOGRA, SILIGURI, DARJEELING vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1) BEGUSARAI, INCOME TAX OFFICE, NH- , HARHAR CHOWK BEGUSARARI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that both the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) passed ex-parte orders and the CIT(A) did not decide all grounds on merits. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the case was restored to the Assessing Officer for de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against an ex-parte assessment order was dismissed by the CIT(A). The assessee contended that both the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) passed ex-parte orders and the CIT(A) failed to decide all grounds of appeal, violating natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte orders passed by the lower authorities, without deciding all grounds of appeal, violate principles of natural justice and warrant a de-novo assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 15.01.2026 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act on 03.03.2023 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 03.03.2023, Assessee filed an Appeal before the CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide Order dated 15.01.2026, dismissed the Appeal of the Assessee. As Jeetendra Kumar Gupta; A.Y: 2015-16 against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 15.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026