AJEET SINGH,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the reasons provided for the delay in filing the appeals were not satisfactory and did not constitute sufficient cause. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as time-barred.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed three appeals against the orders of the CIT(A)/NFAC for AYs 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2022-23. The appeals were filed beyond the prescribed time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals were filed within the prescribed time limit and if the delay could be condoned due to sufficient cause.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) These three appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate orders of learned CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi, vide common orders dated 30.12.2025, for the AYs 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2022-23. I will first take the appeal in ITA No. 415/Lkw/2026 as lead case. In all the AYs the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
I.T.A. Nos. 413 to 415/Lkw/2026 Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2022-23 2 “01. That the CIT(A) was not justified to upheld the addition of Rs. 10,30,000/- under section 69A being in respect of the purchase of prop
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026