PROXIMA CREATIONS ,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(1), PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee, a partnership firm, appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders upholding disallowances under Section 43B and additions under Section 68. The Assessing Officer made these additions due to non-compliance by the assessee during assessment proceedings.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had erred in sustaining the addition on under-valuation of closing Work-in-Progress (WIP) without fully appreciating the evidence. The Tribunal decided to provide the assessee with another opportunity to present their case.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance under Section 43B and addition under Section 68 were justified, and whether the valuation of Work-in-Progress was correctly assessed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 43B,Section 68,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 263,Section 45(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE
Before: DR. MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders of CIT(A) (i) ITA No. 2626/PUN/2025 the appeal was filed against the order of NFAC/CIT(A) passed u/sec 144r.w.s. 144B and u/sec250 of the Income Tax Act for the A.Y. 2018-19.(II) ITA No. 2808/PUN/2025, the appeal is filed against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC passed u/sec 143(3) r.w.s. 263 with u/sec 144B of the Act and u/sec250 of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Palam Gurgaon…ITA 2619/DEL/2026[2010]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026