RELIABLE SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES (ORISSA) PRIVATE LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), CUTTACK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment was valid despite minor discrepancies in figures. However, it deleted the addition on account of TDS, while upholding additions related to service tax, PF & ESI, and miscellaneous expenses.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a stay application and an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2018-19. The primary issues revolved around the validity of assessment reopening, service tax liability, PF/ESI contributions, miscellaneous expenses, and TDS.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of the assessment reopening based on alleged incorrect figures and the merits of additions made by the AO regarding service tax, PF/ESI, miscellaneous expenses, and TDS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “HYBRID COURT AT CUTTACK”
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
PER BENCH: The stay application and the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to ‘CIT(A)) in appeal no.NFAC/2017-18/10247440 dated 10/12/2025 for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. Shri Lalatendu Sahu & Manmohan Mishra, A
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148A
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026