ARS MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, BOKARO,BOKARO vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, HAZARIBAGH, HAZARIBAGH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 143(2) was not in consonance with the mandatory CBDT instructions and was therefore invalid. Consequently, all subsequent assessment proceedings were also deemed invalid and quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee argued that the notice issued under Section 143(2) was not in the prescribed format as per CBDT instructions for the relevant assessment year. They contended that an invalid notice renders subsequent proceedings void.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the notice issued under Section 143(2) due to non-compliance with CBDT prescribed formats, and its impact on the subsequent assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (in short, the ld. CIT(A) in Appeal No. CIT(A), Hazaribagh/10254/2019-20 dated 23/11/2025 for the A.Y. 2017-18. 2. Shri Devesh Poddar, ld. A.R. is represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sandipan Khan, ld. Sr.DR is represented on behalf of the revenue.
The ld. A.R. of the assessee submitted that the notice issued under Section 143(2) is not in the prescribed format as revised by the CBDT for the impugned assessment year. The ld. AR submitted that since the notice U/s 143(2) is itself invalid, the subsequent proceed
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026