ASHISH KESARWANI,MIRZAPUR vs. THE I.T.O WARD 3(1), MIRZAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as it was filed beyond the statutory time limit. The assessee was given liberty to approach the Tribunal again if sufficient cause for the delay and non-appearance could be shown.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for AY 2012-13 beyond the prescribed time limit. No application for condonation of delay was filed, and the assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the delay in filing the appeal and the absence of the assessee during the hearing. The validity of the assessment proceedings and additions were secondary to the procedural defect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH ‘SMC’, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.
(A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi, dated 24.09.2024, for the AY 2012-13. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“01. That notice issued u/s 148 and order passed by the learned Assessing Officer, pursuant thereto, are wholly illegal and without juri iction and liable to be quashed.
That the proceedings u/s 147 has neither been validly initiated nor the notice under section 148 has been validly issued since the same was n ever served upon the appellant as a result of which the whole of the proceedings is bad in la w and void ab initio. Assessment Year:2012
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026