BRAJBHOOMI INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,GWALIOR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1(1), GWALIOR, GWALIOR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay subject to payment of costs. It restored the appeal to the NFAC for de novo adjudication, emphasizing that the assessee must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a significant delay of 515 days. The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) had previously decided the issue ex parte without a proper adjudication on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC's ex parte decision without adjudicating on merits is sustainable. The need for a fair hearing and proper adjudication of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “SMC”: AGRA
The appeal in ITA No. 271/AGR/2026 for AY 2018-19, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 19.08.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 18.02.2020 by the Assessing Officer, CPC, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
I find that there is a delay in filing of appeal by the assessee by 515 days. Considering the reasons adduced in the condonation petition, I am inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 25,000 to Legal Aid Authority of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench on or before 10.06.2026.
ITA No. 271/AGR/2026 Brajbhoomi Industrial Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd
On going through the grounds raised by the assessee and the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay, we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments except due to exceptional or bonafide circumstances. With these observations, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
I make it very clear that the ld CIT(A) shall ensure that assessee had made payment of cost of ₹25,000 on before 10.06.2026 to the stipulated Authority and then take up the case for hearing.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose in the above mentioned terms.
Order pronounced in the open court on 02/06/2026.
-Sd/- (M. BALAGANESH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated:02/06/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT
ITA No. 271/AGR/2026 Brajbhoomi Industrial Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd
CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, AGRA BENCH
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026