LAXMI CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED ,PUNE vs. ITO WD-3(1), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 677/PUN/2026Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 June 2026AY 2020-215 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) as the interest income was derived from investments with cooperative societies. The disallowance made by the CPC under Section 143(1) was also questioned on procedural grounds.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a Cooperative Housing Society, claimed a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned on deposits with Cooperative Banks. The Assessing Officer processed the return under Section 143(1) and disallowed this deduction, which was upheld by the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on interest earned from cooperative banks, and whether the CPC had the power to disallow such deduction under Section 143(1) prior to Finance Act, 2021.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(d),Section 143(1),Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE

Before: DR.MANISH BORAD

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B Phadke
For Respondent: Shri Manish Sinha
Hearing: 30.04.2026Pronounced: 02.06.2026

The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2020-21 is directed against the order dated 15.12.2025 framed by Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Delhi passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) arising out of Intimation Order dated 25.11.2021 passed u/s.143(1) of the Act.

2.

The only issue for my consideration is disallowance u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act at Rs.14,98,110/-.

3.

At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee deserves to succeed firstly on the ground that no such disallowance u/s.80P could have been made by CPC for A.Y. 2020-21 as necessary powers have been introduced by the Finance Act 01.04.2021. Secondly, even otherwise on merits in light of plethora of decisions assessee is eligible to claim deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act on the interest earned from the deposits/investments with Cooperative Banks.

4 On the other hand, ld. DR supported the order of ld.CIT(A).

5.

I have heard the rival contentions and perused the record placed before me. I note that the assesse is a Cooperative Housing Society and income of Rs.18,39,680/- declared in the return for A.Y. 2020-21 filed on 24.10.2020. Return processed u/s.143(1) of the Act disallowing deduction of Rs.14,98,110/- claimed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. Assessee preferred appeal before ld.CIT(A) and ld.CIT(A) upheld the action of CPC disallowing the said deduction. Now the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.

6.

I note that assessee in its ground-wise submissions made before ld.CIT(A) submitted that it has been earning interest from Cooperative Banks for past many years since and for A.Yrs. 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2017-18 the returned income has been accepted allowing deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act for respective years. Assessee has also made submissions stating that decisions have been rendered on the similar issue deciding that prior to Finance Act, 2021, no express authority provided to CPC u/s.143(1)(a)(v) of the Act to disallow the deduction claimed under Chapter VIA of the Act for delay in filing income tax return. Ld. DR could not controvert the above position.

7.

So far as the alleged issue about allowing of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act, there is no dispute that the assessee is a registered under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and is providing credit facilities to its Members and derived interest income on investments kept with Cooperative Societies/Banks. The provisions of section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, provides for deduction towards any income by way of interest or dividend derived by a co- operative society from its investment with any other co- operative society. The term Cooperative Society has been defined u/s. 2(19) of the Act, which includes a co-operative society registered under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1912 or under any other law for the time being in force in any state for the registration of co-operative societies. Perusal of the aforesaid definition would make it clear that cooperative Society means a cooperative society registered under Cooperative Societies Act, 1912 as defined under the Act, be it a co-operative society carrying on banking business or cooperative society carrying on the other business or a cooperative bank. Interest/dividend income earned from a cooperative society from its investment with other cooperative societies, whether such society is cooperative bank or not is to be considered for allowing deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act.

8.

This issue is no longer res integra by virtue of catena of decisions passed by this Tribunal on this very issue and the assessee’s case is squarely covered in its favour. In the case of Thorapadi Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd & Others vs ITO in W.P. Nos. 11172 and others, judgment dated 10.10.2023, the Hon'ble High Court of Madras following the decision of Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of CIT vs The Salem Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd in Tax Case Appeal No. 5 of 2015 held that a cooperative society is entitled to avail the benefit u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act.

9.

In light of above discussion, I hold that assessee is entitled to deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act at Rs.14,98,110/-. Finding of ld.CIT(A) is reversed. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed.

10.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced on this 02nd day of June, 2026. (MANISH BORAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; दिन ांक / Dated : 02nd June, 2026. Satish

Satish Kumar Madishetty 5 आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेपिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent.

2.3.

The Pr. CIT concerned. विभ गीय प्रतितनधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, “SMC” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. ग र्ड फ़ इल / Guard File. 5. आिेश नुस र / BY ORDER,

////

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)

All 2,440 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(d) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →