ACIT CIRCLE 3(2)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. THE NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) concerning interest payments on deposits and promotional activities. The assessee, NABARD, argued that the interest was diverted at source and not its income, and that promotional expenses were allowable under Section 36(1)(xii) after being notified.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision, holding that the interest on funds held for government schemes was not taxable in NABARD's hands as it acted as a nodal agency. It also held that promotional expenses were allowable as NABARD was notified under Section 36(1)(xii) for the relevant assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether interest on funds held for government schemes is taxable in the hands of NABARD, and whether promotional expenses are allowable under Section 36(1)(xii) for NABARD.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.M.] :- The present appeal emanating from the appellate order dated 03.12.2025is preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to P a g e | 2 A.Y. 2022-23 The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rajeshkumar Shah, Navagam, Udhana vs Income Tax Officer, AdajanITA 283/SRT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Ferosh D Marak, Meghalaya vs ITO, W-1, Shillong, MeghalayaITA 265/GTY/2025[2017-2018]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chandan Patra, Bbsr vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Corbett Kyari Jungle Resort vs. The State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S N B Enterprises vs. The Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Sumit Bhoora vs. M/ S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Jayesh Patel vs. M/S Aasharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026