SERAJUDDIN AND CO,NEAR TV CENTRE vs. ACIT,TDS, BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that TDS is applicable when income accrues or is received, not merely on year-end provisions. Since TDS was deducted when the expenses crystallized and paid, and no prejudice was caused to the revenue, the addition was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee made year-end provisions for audit and management consultancy fees for AY 2017-18. The actual services were rendered and invoices received in AY 2018-19, during which TDS was deducted and deposited. The lower authorities treated the assessee as in default for not deducting TDS on the provisions.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS is deductible on year-end provisions for expenses when the actual liability crystallizes in a subsequent period. Applicability of CBDT circulars and High Court judgments on TDS provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
Per Bench: Out of the above two appeals, ITA No.165/CTK/2026 is a duplicate file in ITA No.153/CTK/2026. Both the appeals have been listed today for hearing. Accordingly, we dismiss ITA No.165/CTK/2026 being duplicate to ITA No.153/CTK/2026. 2. Now, we proceed to decide ITA No.153/CTK/2026 filed by the assessee against the order of Addl/JCIT(A), Panaji, dated 19.11.2025 for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, however, written submission has been filed on behalf of the asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194J
- Mahesh Pulaveni, Adilabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 991/HYD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Shagun Singhal, Ludhiana vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 899/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Competitiveness Mindset Institute (Cmi)… vs CIT Exemption, JaipurITA 112/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
- Competitiveness Mindset Institute (Cmi)… vs CIT Exemption, JaipurITA 1414/JPR/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026