PRAMOD KUMAR,LALGANG vs. ITO WARD 1(3) VAISHALI, HAJIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the genuine medical reasons provided. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s order to be ex-parte and lacking in merits, thus restoring the issue for de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a significant delay of 371 days, citing his wife's cancer treatment as the reason. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's earlier appeal ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is justifiable, and whether the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) was passed in violation of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA “SMC” BENCH
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 28.02.2025, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. There is a delay of 371 days in filing the captioned Appeal. The Assessee filed an application along with affidavit for condonation of delay narrating the reasons which are reproduced as under: -
“1. That the present appeal is being filed against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 28.02.2025. Pramod Kumar; A.Y: 2017-18 2. That there is a delay of 424 days in filing the present appeal before this Hon’ble Tribunal.
That
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026