SONNY GREWAL,OLD RAJENDER NAGAR, NEW DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK, CUTTACK, ORISSA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approvals were unsustainable as they lacked proper application of mind and were not in the prescribed form, citing decisions of the Jurisdictional High Court and the Supreme Court. Consequently, the consequential assessment orders were also quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged approvals granted under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act. The approvals were consolidated in a single order and appeared to be granted mechanically without proper application of mind.
What were the issues?
Whether consolidated and mechanically granted approvals under Section 153D are valid and whether consequential assessments are sustainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
Per Bench: The captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar in Appeal No.CIT(A), Bhubaneswar- 2/10019/2008-09, CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2/10038/2009-10, CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2/10048/2010-11, CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2/10045/2011-12, CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2/10172/2012-13 & CIT(A), Bhubaneswar- 2/10431/2013-14 all dated 09.10.2025 respectively.
Shri Maneesh Upnejja, AR, appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Jeetendra Kumar, C
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026