VENKATA SESHU KUMARI VANKA,KRISHNA vs. ITO, WARD 1(1),, VIJAYWADA.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delays in filing the appeals, finding the reasons to be bonafide and beyond the assessees' control. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment notices as barred by limitation.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by different assessees against orders of the CIT(A)-NFAC for AY 2015-2016. Delays in filing appeals were attributed to the assessees suffering from illnesses like fever and dengue.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the condonation of delay in filing appeals and the validity of reassessment notices issued beyond the prescribed limitation period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 250,Section 69A,Section 44AD,Section 148,Section 149
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM DB BENCH VISAKHAPATNAM
BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Sl. ITA.No. Name of the Assessee Name of Order Appealed No. Respondent against the Order dated of the learned CIT(A)-NFAC & A.Y. 1. 631/Viz./2025 Syamala Cheerla, Krishna ITO, Ward-2(1), Lanka, VIJAYAWADA. Vijayawada Dated PIN – 520 013 22.08.2025 for PAN AWCPC1998D the AY 2015- 2016 2. 712/Viz./2025 Bala Raju Tellam ITO, Ward-1, Diddukuru (V) MLA-Polavaram, ELURU Dated Doramamidi Post, 26.06.2025 for Buttayagudem Mandal, West the AY 2015- Godavari Dist. PIN 534 448 2016 PAN AJEPT4218Q 3. 327/Viz./2026 Venkata Rao Vemuri, ITO, Circle-2(1), Dated Patamata, Vijayawada. Vijayawada 17.12.2025 for PIN – 520 008 the AY 2015- PAN ACKPV9367P 2016 4. 409/Viz./2026 Venkata Seshu Kumari Vanka, ITO, Ward-1(1), Dated KANCHIKACHERLA – 521 180 Vijayawada 23.03.2026 for Krishna District. the AY 2015- PAN ALJPV1752C 2016 5. 737/Viz./2026 Subhash Varma Atti, ITO, Ward-1(1), Dated Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam 29.04.2026 for PAN AGAPA3775A the AY 2015- 2016
For Assessee : Sri C Subrahmanyam, C.A. For Revenue : Sri A.P. Babu, Sr. AR
Date of Hear
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026