GHANTA SRINIVAS,GUNTUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR., GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271AAD was not leviable as it was intended for different circumstances. Furthermore, the assessment order itself was found to be invalid due to procedural irregularities in its initiation after a search.
What were the facts?
Following a search operation where substantial cash was found, the assessee, a doctor, offered additional income for two assessment years. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment without additions but initiated penalty proceedings under sections 270A and 271AAD.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of penalty proceedings under section 271AAD and the validity of the assessment order passed without following the prescribed procedure after a search.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 148,Section 270A,Section 271AAD,Section 274
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE
PER MANJUNATHA G, AM: These appeals are filed by the Assessee against different orders of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Visakhapatnam-3 [hereinafter in short “Ld. CIT(A)”] vide DIN: ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1083494643(1) dated 09.12.2025 & DIN: ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1083613962(1) dated 12.12.20252025 for the A.Y. 2022-23. I
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026