VIJAYA LAKSHMI MUNNANGI,VIJAYAWADA vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the assessee's genuine personal difficulties and the sympathetic approach adopted by the Hon'ble Telangana High Court in similar cases. The Tribunal also decided to set aside the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, including the additional ground raised by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a significant delay of 158 days due to personal difficulties related to her son's medical condition. The assessee also raised an additional ground regarding the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned due to genuine personal difficulties, and whether an additional ground regarding the validity of a Section 148 notice can be admitted for adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM DB BENCH VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA G.
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT :
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 16.01.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Assessment Centre [in short "NFAC"], Delhi for the assessment year 2017-2018. 2 ITA.No.540/Viz./2025
There is a delay of 158 days in filing the present appeal. The assessee has filed a petition for condonation of delay which is supported by the detailed affidavit of the assessee. Learned Authorised Representative of the Assessee submitted that son of the assessee is suffering from an intellectual disability of 83% and requires regular treatment and physiotherapy at
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026