JAI KISSAN FOODS,KASHIPUR vs. WARD-2(2)(1) KASHI PUR, KASHIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delays in filing the appeals before the CIT(A), emphasizing that technicalities should not impede substantial justice. The appeals were restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the CIT(A) with significant delays of 373 and 152 days. The CIT(A) refused to condone these delays, citing lack of justifiable reasons.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in refusing to condone the substantial delays in filing the appeals without considering the principles of substantial justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH “SMC & DB”, DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM: These assessee’s twin appeals ITA Nos.173 & 176/DDN/2026 for assessment year 2021-22 and 2024-25 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A)-13, Mumbai’s orders, both 24.02.2026, having DINs and orders no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1086479286(1) and ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1086474636(1), involving proceedings
ITA Nos.173 & 176/DDN/2026
under section 143(1) and 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), respectively. Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the learned CIT(A) has refused to condone the delays of 373 days and 152 days in filing of the assessee’s lower appeals for AYs 2021-22 and 2024- 25. Both the assessee’s lower appeals were instituted on 08.08.2025 against the Assessing Officer’s assessments framed 01.07.2024 and 07.02.2025, thereby holding that the same had not been explained in light of the justifiable reasons. 3. Faced with the situation, learned departmental representative could hardly dispute that the assessee had indeed filed his condonation petitions before the CIT(A) explaining all the reasons on account of circumstances beyond his control. 4. That being the case, we hereby quote Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC), settling the issue long back that all such technical aspects must make way for the cause of substantial justice. Accordingly, the delays caused in filing of both the appeals before the CIT(A) are
2 | P a g e
ITA Nos.173 & 176/DDN/2026
condoned and the assessee’s instant twin appeals are restored back to the CIT(A) for its afresh appropriate adjudication within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly. 5. These assessee’s twin appeals ITA Nos.173 & 176/DDN/2026 are allowed for statistical purposes. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files. Order pronounced in the open court on 5th June, 2026 Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 5th June, 2026. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
3 | P a g e
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026