SHRI KALPESH VINODBHAI PATEL,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 2 (1) RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the assessment order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing them to examine all issues including the validity of reassessment proceedings. The revisionary order under Section 263 was also set aside as the underlying assessment order was nullified.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was reassessed under Section 147, with additions made for alleged bogus sales due to cancelled GST registrations of purchasers and lack of invoices. The assessee's appeal to the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-compliance.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of the reassessment proceedings, the genuineness of sales transactions, and the propriety of the revisionary order under Section 263.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 148A,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 68,Section 263
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM: These two appeals have been preferred by the same assessee. ITA No. 417/Rjt/2025 arises out of the order passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.PCIT"], dated 27.03.2025, which, in turn, arises from the assessment order passed under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], dated 29.03.2023. ITA No. 484/Rjt/2025 ar
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026