SHARADBHAI MANSUKHBHAI KUMBHANI,AMRELI vs. THE ITO WARD 3(3)(1), SURAT, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the revisionary order under section 263 was set aside and remanded, the consequential assessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 also becomes infructuous and does not survive.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged an addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The AO's order was passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263, but the revisionary proceedings under section 263 were later remanded back to the Pr. CIT by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether a consequential assessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 survives when the original revisionary order under section 263 is set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short “CIT(A)”] dated 15.12.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2015-16. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The learned Commissioner (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi erred in confirming action of the assessing officer in making addition of Rs1,04,23,220/-bydisallowing exemption claimed u/s 54B of the Act.
The learned Commissioner (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi failed to appreciate that order u/s 263 of the Act has
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 54B
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Sheela Devi, Etawah vs ITO, Ward 2(2)(5), EtawahITA 419/AGR/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Shailendra Kumar Sogani, Bhopal vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 4(1)…ITA 1076/IND/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026