AMINES AND PLASTICIZERS LTD,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1, GUWAHATI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that when the basis for reassessment is solely derived from incriminating material found during a third-party search, the assessment proceedings must be initiated under Section 153C, not Section 148. Since the assessment was based entirely on the Dishman Group search, the notice under Section 148 and the subsequent assessment orders were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened under Section 148 based on information from a search on a third party (Dishman Group). The assessee argued that the reopening should have been under Section 153C, as no independent material was found. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) upheld the reopening under Section 148.
What were the issues?
Whether reopening of assessment under Section 148 is valid when the entire basis is information from a search on a third party, or if Section 153C should have been invoked.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 153C,Section 153A,Section 153B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI “DB” BENCH
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These captioned Appeals are filed by the Assessee against the orders of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 28.01.2025, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Years2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively.
Since the captioned Appeals have been filed by the single Assessee, having identical issues to be decided, the above Appeals are heard together and decided vide this common order.
ITA Nos.148 to 150/GTY/2025 Amines and Plasticizers Limited; A.Ys: 2013-14 to 2015-16
There is a delay of 68 days in f
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026