ACIT,, ALLAHABAD vs. ALLD.H.SCHOOL SOCIETY,, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Third Member held that the AO erred in questioning the charitable objects of the society, especially after it had been granted registration under Section 12AA. The enquiry should be confined to verifying the specific expenses disallowed by estimation.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order that deleted an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO had disallowed 20% of establishment, administrative, and repair & maintenance expenses for want of supporting evidence. A Third Member was nominated due to a difference of opinion between the original Members.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO can question the charitable objects of a registered society, and whether the Tribunal can direct the AO to conduct enquiries beyond the grounds of appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 ACIT v. Allahabad High School Society Circle II 4, P.D. Tandon Road Allahabad Allahabad (U.P) TAN/PAN:AABTA2869 (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri A. N. Mishra, CIT(DR) Respondent by: Shri Ashish Bansal, Advocate ORDER UNDER SECTION 255(4) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, J.M.:
This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 23.09.2010, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld. CIT(A)] for Assessment Year 2006-07
0 On account of difference of opinion between the Members, who originally heard the appeal, a Third Member was nominated to adjudicate the following questions:-
(1) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal can travel beyond the grounds raised in the appeal and direct the AO to make enquiries on all other issues, which was not raised in the grounds of appeal.
ITA No.341/ALLD/2010 2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, while setting aside the assessment back to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026