ORISSA ASSEMBLY OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES,CUTTACK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, CUTTACK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that denying the benefit of Sections 11 & 12 and taxing entire receipts under the head 'business' is not a permissible adjustment under Section 143(1). Therefore, the intimation and the order rejecting the rectification were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee was denied the benefit of registration under Section 12A in an intimation issued under Section 143(1). A rectification application under Section 154 was rejected, leading to this appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of registration and taxation of entire receipts under Section 143(1) is a permissible adjustment, and if the rejection of a rectification application for such an error was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 11,Section 12,Section 12A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & RAJESH KUMAR
Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld Addl/JCIT(A)- 9, Mumbai dated 18.3.2026 in Appeal No. Addl/JCIT(A)-9, Mumbai/10061/2022-23 for the assessment year 2023-24. 2. Shri Ambika Prasad Mohanty, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Vijaya Singh, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.
It was submitted by ld AR that the return filed by the assessee came to be processed and an intimation came to be issued u/s.143(1) on 4.12.2024, wherein, the assessee has been denied the benefit of registration u/s.12A of the Act and the entire receipts of the assessee has been brought to tax. It was the submission that the assessee has filed recti
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026