ANSUMAN MEMORIAL TRUST,KUMARI ,JARAKA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee admittedly had no registration prior to April 1, 2021, and that any granted registration cannot be withdrawn without a show-cause notice. The order of the CIT(Exemption) was set aside, and the issues were restored for adjudication after considering the assessee's evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 80G, but the CIT(Exemption) refused it, stating the assessee failed to provide proof of registration prior to April 1, 2021. The assessee argued they obtained their first registration on November 14, 2022, and requested the issue be readjudicated.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in refusing 80G registration due to lack of prior registration, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration of evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the refusal to grant the registration u/s 80G by the ld. CIT(Exemption) [‘CIT(E)’] vide its order dated 24/02/2026 for the assessment year 2025-26. 2. Shri Laxmikanta Panda, CA, appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Vijay Singh , Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue.
The ld. AR drew our attention to para 3 of the order of the ld. CIT(E) which reads as follows:
“3. However, the assessee has failed to furnish the registration copy evidencing registration prior to 01.04.2021, despite opportunity being provided. In the absence of proof of registration prior to 01.04.2021, the assesse's application for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026