CHANDRASHEKHAR JANGDE,BURHANPUR vs. ITO, BURHANPUR, BURHANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the belated filing of Form 10E should not result in the denial of substantial relief if the assessee is otherwise entitled to it. The time limit for filing Form 10E should be construed liberally in the given circumstances.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought relief under Section 89 of the Income Tax Act for salary paid in arrears. The assessee filed Form 10E belatedly, citing technical issues and COVID-19. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) denied the relief due to the delay in filing Form 10E.
What were the issues?
Whether relief under Section 89 can be denied solely on the ground of belatedly filing Form 10E, and if the time limit for filing Form 10E should be interpreted liberally.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearingNumber:-ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1082391381(1)
dated 07.11.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned
order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2020-21 and the Chandrashekhar Jangde ITA No. 20/Ind/2026 - A.Y.2020-21
corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by an intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the act dated 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 89
- Nirmala Kaushik, Delhi vs Income Tax Assessment Unit, DelhiITA 5301/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- Suresh Yashwant Awar, Igatpuri vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2660/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
- Ram Dattatray Kaldate, Aurangabad vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1(1), AurangabadITA 2177/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Jun 2026AY 2019-20
- Prakash Sukhdeo Sonawane, Aurangabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), AurangabadITA 2180/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Jun 2026AY 2019-20
- Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Auraiya vs ACIT Circle-1, AgraITA 162/AGR/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed5 Jun 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026