LAXMI RICE MILL (P) (LTD),KUSUMKHAL, BELGAON, BELGAON vs. ITO, WARD 1, BOLANGIR, BALANGIR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to cooperate in the proceedings to provide one more opportunity for representation.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the penalty levied under Section 271D. The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A) despite multiple opportunities and also did not appear before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was provided adequate opportunity of hearing by the lower authorities and if the penalty under Section 271D was correctly levied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & RAJESH KUMAR
Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 15.12.2025 in Appeal No. CIT(A), Sambalpur/10013/2020-21 for the assessment year 2014-15 confirming the levy of penalty u/s.271D of the Act.
None appeared for the assessee and Shri Vijaya Singh, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.
We have heard ld Sr DR and perused the record of the case. A perusal of the order of the ld CIT(A) clearly shows that he has given six opportunities by issuance of notice from 25.12.2020 to 3.12.2025. It is observed that in some dates, the assessee has sought adjournment and in other dates, no compliance was made. Before us, none represented on behalf of the assessee and no adjournment petition has been filed. However,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271D
- Sujatha Vaddanapu, Nalgonda vs ITO, Ward-1, NalgondaITA 2048/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Inder Lal Ramrakhyani, Dhamtari vs ITO, DhamtariITA 694/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Harshit Singhania Buildcon, RaipurITA 560/RPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shree Jalaram Finance, Borsad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(4), PetladITA 1785/AHD/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026