SHRI DINAKAR PRABHAKAR PATIL,SOLAPUR vs. ITO WD-2, PANDHARPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in ATM services, filed a return of income which was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer made substantial additions due to unexplained cash deposits and other issues, assessing a much higher total income. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions after the assessee failed to comply with notices.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance. However, considering principles of natural justice, the Tribunal decided to provide the assessee with another opportunity to present their case.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering the merits of the case, and whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 250,Section 69A,Section 194N,Section 143(1),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 44AD
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE
Before: DR. MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
- The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi passed u/sec 143(3) r.w.s.144B and u/sec250 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) sustaining the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is engaged in operating ATM services and has field return of income for the A.Y. 2023-24 on 31.07.2023 disclosing a total income of Rs. 1,61,560/- and subsequently, the return of income was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act and the case was select for scrutiny under t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rajeshkumar Shah, Navagam, Udhana vs Income Tax Officer, AdajanITA 283/SRT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Ferosh D Marak, Meghalaya vs ITO, W-1, Shillong, MeghalayaITA 265/GTY/2025[2017-2018]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026