SWAGATA MONDAL,,NEW BARRACKPORE vs. ITO, WARD 49(1), KOLKATA,, KOLKATA
What were the facts?
The assessee sold an immovable property and declared a sale consideration lower than the stamp duty value. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on Section 50C and also for alleged concealment of salary income. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's additions.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the issues of capital gains and salary income to the AO for fresh consideration, taking into account the valuation report and Form 26AS.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made by the AO under Section 50C and for concealment of salary income were justified, considering the available valuation reports and salary details.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Act for AY 2016-17 dated 11.02.2025. 1.1 The Registry has informed that the appeal is barred by limitation by 372 days. The assessee has filed an affidavit along with a petition for condonation of delay explaining the reasons that the earlier Tax Consultant who used to look after the income tax matters did not look into the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50C
- Krishna Ginning and Pressing Factory… vs DCIT/ACIT Circle 1 (1), RajkotITA 468/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Malini Satish Parekh, Surat vs ITO, Ward 2(3), SuratITA 900/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Mehboob Khan, Raosar vs Assessing Officer Ashok Nagar, Ashok NagarITA 621/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Sip Infotech Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 5355/MUM/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Sudhir Rawat, Jabalpur vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3), JabalpurITA 250/JAB/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Prakash Enterprises Its Proprietor Sudhir Kumar Choudhary vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sree Narayan Construction vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Recro Furniture Private Limited vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Ipca Laboratories LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Jt. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Scottment Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026