HAPAG-LLYOD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE 2(2)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a German shipping company, claimed exemption for income from feeder vessels under the India-Germany DTAA. The Assessing Officer and DRP held this income taxable under Section 44B of the Income Tax Act, as it was not covered by Article 8 of the DTAA.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that receipts from feeder vessels are eligible for exemption under Article 8 of the India-Germany DTAA, following consistent past decisions of the ITAT and High Court. Therefore, such income is not taxable in India.
What were the issues?
Whether income from transportation of cargo through feeder vessels is taxable in India or exempt under Article 8 of the India-Germany DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President:
Present appeal has been preferred by the assessee challenging the final assessment order dated 29.10.2025 passed under section (u/s.) 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24, in pursuance to directions of learned Dispute Resolution Panel (‘DRP’).
Ground No.1 being of general in nature does not require adjudication.
2 Hapag LLyod
At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted, once
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 44B
- Arc Line, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 965/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2026AY 2022-23
- Arc Line, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 584/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2026AY 2017-18
- Arc Line, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 583/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
- Bay Lines, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 524/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2026AY 2023-24
- Bay Lines, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 523/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Jun 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026