DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GWALIOR vs. BANKUTRAMANA BULLION AND DIAMOND PVT. LTD. , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) rightly deleted the additions because the Assessing Officer failed to dispose of the assessee's objections to the reopening notice before passing the assessment order, violating principles of natural justice. Furthermore, the CIT(A) had exhaustively examined the documentary evidence and found that shares were issued by conversion of unsecured loans, not as new capital receipts.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, dealing in bullion, had unsecured loans and share capital added to its income as unexplained credits. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment and made additions under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE. The CIT(A) deleted these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions made under Section 68, and whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid without disposing of assessee's objections.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 147,Section 148,Section 151,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (DB
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGHBRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER:SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER The facts and issues involved in both these appeals are almost identical, hence, for the sake of convenience and brevity, these appeals are being decided by this common order. The facts of ITA No. 570/Agr/2025 are only being narrated as under.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 17.10.2025 passed in appeal No NFAC/2013-14/10124985 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC(Delhi)
ITA No.570&571/Agr/2025 [(hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)] u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026