SHIV KUMAR HISSARIA CHARITABLE TRUST,JODHPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and restored the application for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to provide complete and verifiable evidence for all its activities, and the CIT(E) was instructed to consider all documents and make independent inquiries.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for regular registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) after being granted provisional registration. The CIT(E) rejected the application and cancelled the provisional registration due to alleged non-furnishing of complete and verifiable documentary evidence regarding its activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for registration and cancelling provisional registration without proper verification of documents and without granting adequate opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH JODHPUR
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26.06.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Jaipur [“CIT(E)”], in Form No. 10AD. By the impugned order, the CIT(E), invoking section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”], rejected the assessee’s
2 Shiv Kumar Hissaria Charitable Trust application in Form No. 10AB filed under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act and also cancelled the provisional registration earlier granted to the assessee on 27.05.2021 under section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026