THE BULLET BUS,MAHARAJKA, SRIGANGANAGAR. vs. ITO, WARD-3,, SRIGANGANAGAR

ITA 943/JODH/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 August 2026AY 2017-186 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO for fresh assessment, considering that the assessee was unheard and significant additions were made. The assessee was directed to be given a due opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was filed against the CIT(A)'s order which upheld additions made by the AO. The assessee claimed non-participation in both assessment and appellate proceedings due to lack of awareness of notices and medical issues of a key partner.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from participating in assessment and appellate proceedings, and if the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, “DB” BENCH, JODHPUR

For Appellant: Adv. (thru
For Respondent: Ms. Nidhi Nair, Addl. CIT-Sr, DR (Thru V.C.)
Hearing: 18.08.2026Pronounced: 25.08.2026

Per Annapurna Gupta, AM:- The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal CIT(A), Jaipur 04 (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated

P a g e | 2 The Bullet Bus 11.10.2024 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

2.

The grounds raised by the assessee read as under:-

1.

That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld CIT(A) grossly erred in upholding the legality & validity of order passed by the Ld AO.

2.

That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld CIT(A) grossly erred

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →