JANAK NANDAN SINGH MEMORIAL SEVA SANSTHAN,PATNA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD - 1, PATNA, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and directed the assessee to upload the provisional/regular registration certificate. The matter was restored to the CIT(E) to decide the application afresh after providing an opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for approval under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) which was rejected by the CIT(E) for not providing a provisional/regular registration certificate. The assessee claimed this was an inadvertent omission and sought an opportunity to upload the certificate.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for approval under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) solely on the ground of non-submission of a provisional/regular registration certificate, and if an opportunity should be granted to the assessee to rectify the omission.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA “DB” BENCH
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) (‘Ld. CIT(E)’ for short) dated 12.03.2026, wherein the application filed by the Assessee in Form No.10AB for approval u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) has been rejected.
There is a delay of 09 days in filing the Appeal. The Assessee filed an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay, the delay of 09 days in filing the present Appeal is hereby condoned. Janak Nandan Singh Memorial Seva Sansthan; A.Y: 2025-26
Brief facts of the case
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026