ASHOK KUMAR JAIN,INDORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- UJJAIN, STATION INDORE, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the excess stock found was part of the assessee's regular business and not an unexplained investment. Therefore, the higher tax rate under Section 115BBE was not applicable.
What were the facts?
During a survey, excess stock of gold and silver jewellery was found in the assessee's business premises. The assessee voluntarily offered this excess stock as additional income, which was then taxed at the slab rate.
What were the issues?
Whether excess stock found during a survey, offered as income by the assessee, should be taxed under Section 115BBE as unexplained investment or at the normal slab rate as business income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69B,Section 115BBE,Section 68,Section 69,Section 69A,Section 69C,Section 69D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as and by way of a second appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing No:- CIT (A)-3, Bhopal/IT/11512/2019-20 dated
2025 passed by the Ld. CIT (A) u/s 250 of the Act,
which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned order”.
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ITA No. 692/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2020-21
The Relevant Assessment year is 2020-21 and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an assessme
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69B
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S Rajguru Foods, BijapurITA 77/PAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Alka Ajit Shah, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer Ward 20(1)(1), MumbaiITA 1915/MUM/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Rama Krishna Jewellers Private Limited…ITA 1289/DEL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Front Line Guards Private Limited, Navi… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(1)(1)…ITA 7909/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Haripa Industries, Kolkata vs ITO, Central Circle 4(1), KolkataITA 2283/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026