BIHARI LAL MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, GURGAON,HARYANA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS) CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E)'s order was based on auditor's observations and financial discrepancies, and the appellant did not provide sufficient explanations. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee society applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application citing defects in financial statements and adverse observations from the statutory auditor regarding the genuineness of activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application based on audit qualifications and financial discrepancies without providing sufficient opportunity for explanation. The genuineness of the society's activities and financial transparency were key concerns.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: VIRTUAL MODE "ी लिलत कुमार, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी िवजय वमा" , लेखा सद" BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JM & SHRI. VIJAY VARMA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 658 /Chd/ 2026 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2026-27 Bihari Lal Memorial Educational बनाम The CIT (Exemptions) Society Chandigarh C/o C A Keshri Nandan Agarwal, 3029/18, Rambass, AMSKY & Co., Bharawas Gate, Near Saini Chopal, Rewari, Haryana-123401 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAB6239P अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Rohit Garg, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Jaishree Sharma, CIT, DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24/08/2026 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 25/08/2026 आदेश/Order PER VIJAY VARMA, A.M: This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the order of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh dt. 13/03/2026. 2. In the present appeal Appellant has raised following grounds:
That the learned CIT(E) has erred both on facts and in law in rejecting the application for registration filed under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. That the learned CI
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026