MAYANK GUNVANTRAY JOSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AHMEDABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were dismissed by the CIT(A) for being barred by limitation. The assessee had received compensation under BSNL VRS-2019 and claimed it as exempt under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The delay in filing the appeal was attributed to bona fide reasons and lack of professional guidance.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, holding that the compensation received under BSNL VRS-2019 is exempt under Section 10(10B) of the Act. The Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the taxable income and grant the refund accordingly.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was to be condoned, and whether the compensation received under BSNL VRS-2019 was exempt under Section 10(10B).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(10B),Section 10(10C),Section 143(1),Section 249(3),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY & SHRI GANGADHAR PANDA
PER GANGADHAR PANDA - ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned two appeals have been filed by the Assessee against the different orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), ADDL/JCIT(A)-3, Hyderabad relates to A.Ys. 2020-21 & 2021-22. Since, the facts and issues involved in two appeals are identical, hence, the captioned appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
We would first take up ITA No. 1470/Ahd/2026 pertaining to A.Y. 2020-21 preferred by the assessee against the order, dated 31.03.2026, passed by the Ld. CIT(A) dismissing the ITA Nos.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026