TRANS ENGINEERS INDIA PVT LTD,PUNE vs. THE DCIT CPC, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Finance Act 2018 provided for a 25% tax rate if the turnover in FY 2015-16 was below Rs. 50 crore. Since the income tax return form did not have a specific column for this detail, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a private limited company, was taxed at 30% by the CPC for AY 2018-19. The assessee claimed a lower tax rate of 25% based on the Finance Act 2018, which stipulated this rate for companies with a turnover not exceeding Rs. 50 crore in FY 2015-16.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correct rate of tax applicable to the assessee for AY 2018-19, specifically whether the concessional rate of 25% applied based on the turnover in FY 2015-16.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B”, PUNE
Before: DR. MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee is against the order dated 22.12.2025 framed by Addl/JCIT(A)-3, Kolkata passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arising out of Intimation order dated 16.10.2019 passed u/s.143(1) of the Act.
The only grievance of the assessee is that the CPC erred in charging the income of the assessee applying tax @30% as against 25% without considering 1st Schedule of Finance Act 2018 providing that if the turnover of the assessee for F.Y.2015-16 does not exceed Rs.50 crore then the total income of the assessee is to be taxed @25%.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record placed before us and carefully gone through the paper book running into 128 pages and judicial pronouncements referred and relied on by Ld. Counsel by the assessee. The issue for consideration is regarding the rate of tax applicable on the assessee for A.Y.2018-19.
We note that the assessee is a Private Limited Company and it furnished return of income for A.Y.2018-19 on 31.10.2018 declaring total income of Rs.22.50 crore approximately. Same has been processed by CPC computing income at Rs.22.62 crore and tax has been charged at @30% as against 25% calculated and paid by the assessee. Assessee carried the matter before CIT(A) and gave reference to the 1st Schedule of Finance Act 2018 which provides that for the purpose of calculating tax for A.Y 2018-19, if the gross turnover of the assessee for F.Y. 2015-16 relevant to A.Y.2016-17 does not exceed Rs.50 crore, then the income of the assessee needs to be taxed @25% as against normal tax rate at @30%. During the course of hearing assessee furnished information about F.Y.2015-16 and stated that the turnover is less than Rs.50 crore. However, since there was no information available in the income tax return filed by the assessee for A.Y.2018-19 specifying the turnover for A.Y 2016-17 (F.Y.2015-16), ld. CIT(A) held that CPC has made no error in taxing the assessee @30%.
Before this Tribunal, the assessee has furnished the copy of paragraph (e) to 1st Schedule of Finance Act 2018 which clearly indicate that the rate of tax applicable on domestic company for A.Y.2018-19 shall be 25% if the total turnover or the gross receipts in F.Y.2015-16 does not exceed 50 crore rupees. Assessee has also furnished copy of audited balance sheet for F.Y.2015-16 as well as F.Y.2017-18. We also note that in the income tax return form which is applicable for A.Y. 2018- 19 there is no specific column in which assessee can mention the details of turnover for A.Y.2016-17. This brings to a situation that on one hand the claim of the assessee is supported by Finance Act 2018 and on the other hand the Revenue’s case is that there is no error in the return processed by CPC because the CPC has processed as per the details furnished in the income tax return form applicable to the assessee.
We however are of the considered view that since Finance Act 2018 clearly provides the applicability of 25% tax rate for the domestic company having turnover less than Rs.50 crore for F.Y.2015-16 and the assessee is claiming that for F.Y.2015- 16 as per the audited balance sheet, its turnover is less than Rs.50 crore, we deem it appropriate to restore this issue to the file of ld. Jurisdictional Assessing Officer who shall examine the claim of assessee after going to the audited financials and other details required to verify the total turnover or the gross receipts for the F.Y.2015-16 and if it is found that the turnover is not exceeding Rs.50 crore then the assessee should be subjected to tax @25% only. Impugned order is set aside and grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced on this 12th day of May, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; दिन ांक / Dated : 12th May, 2026. Satish
Satish Kumar Madishetty Digitally signed by Satish Kumar Madishetty Date: 2026.05.12 16:28:27 +05'30'
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेपिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. विभ गीय प्रतितनधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, “B” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. ग र्ड फ़ इल / Guard File. 5. आिेश नुस र / BY ORDER,
// True Copy // Assistant Registrar, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026