ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA,DEOGHAR vs. ITO, DEOGHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s order was not on merit as the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance. For the interest of justice, the appeal was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration after affording the assessee an opportunity to present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was completed at Rs. 99,36,970/-, and penalty proceedings were initiated. The assessee failed to appear or file submissions before the Assessing Officer, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 29,20,144/-. The appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution by the CIT(A) should be restored to the file of the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 16.10.2025 of the Office of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Assessment Year- 2011-12
The brief facts of the case of the assessee that assessment of the assessee in the present case was completed u/s 144/147 of the Act by assessing total income o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026