SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. CIT,, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following the majority view of the Division Bench and the Third Member, decided various issues concerning additions made by the Assessing Officer. Some additions were deleted, some were sustained, and some matters were restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed four appeals against assessment orders passed under section 153A(b). Due to a difference of opinion between the original members, the issues were referred to a Third Member. The Third Member provided his opinion on various grounds related to capital gains, household expenses, unexplained investments, and purchases.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the justification of additions made by the AO on account of long-term capital gains, low household withdrawals, unexplained investments and purchases, and out-of-books sales. The Tribunal also considered the extent to which such additions should be sustained or set aside.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.:
These four appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A) for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11, dated 13.12.2013, 31.01.2013, 13.12.2013, and 11.03.2014 respectively, which in turn arose from assessment orders passed under section 153A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ITA No. 158/Alld/2013 & 2. Since there was difference of opinion between the Hon’ble Judicial Member and Hon’ble Accountant Member, who
originally heard the appeals. The following questions were referred to Hon’ble Third M
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026