M/SBHOLA FOOD PRODUCTS(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. CIT.(OSD),, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 153A(b) was not sustainable as it was not based on any incriminating material found during the search. The Supreme Court's decision in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd. was relied upon, stating that additions in completed assessments under Section 153A require incriminating material.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns an addition of Rs. 49,54,465/- made under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. This addition was made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in a Section 153A assessment, despite the same issue having been dealt with in a prior Section 143(3) assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether an addition made in a Section 153A assessment can be sustained if it is not based on incriminating material found during a search, especially when the issue was already considered in a prior completed assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 143(3),Section 132(1),Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), Allahabad passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 22.11.2012, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has partly allowed the appeals of the assessee against the orders of the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2006-07 passed under section 153A(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961 on 28.12.2011. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the assessment made under Section 153A(b) of the act is without juri iction, illegal and addition of Rs. 49,54,465/- made by the assessing officer by invoking provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026