PRAKASH SHARMA,NAINPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDLA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a claim for deduction under Section 54B can be considered at any stage if it is a valid claim. The assessment order was set aside and the issue was restored to the AO to verify the claim for deduction under Section 54B.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold an immovable property, which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as a capital asset and computed capital gains. The assessee claimed the property was agricultural land and thus not a capital asset, and also sought deduction under Section 54B for purchasing new agricultural land.
What were the issues?
Whether the property was a capital asset and whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 54B for the purchase of new agricultural land.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(14),Section 50C,Section 54B,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 144,Section 264
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 08.11.2023 pertaining to the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
“1. Ground No. 1 of Appeal That on the facts and under the circumstances of the case, the learned Assessing Officer erred in making the addition of Rs.617,000/- on account of Capital Gain. Ground of Appeal No.2 That the learned CIT(A) was unjustified in dismissed the appeal on the ground that the assessee has mentioned the wrong section of assessment order in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(14)
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ishvarbhai Bhagabhai Patel, Surat vs The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), SuratITA 6/SRT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Malini Satish Parekh, Surat vs ITO, Ward 2(3), SuratITA 900/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026