J.P TOBACO PRODUCTA PVT. LTD. vs. ADD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - SAGAR,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence to satisfy the conditions for deductions under Sections 80HHA and 80IA. However, due to deficiencies in how the AO presented the negative findings and the assessee's lack of effective confrontation, the matter was remanded.
What were the facts?
The assessee company claimed deductions under Sections 80HHA and 80IA for AY 1992-93. These claims were initially disallowed and subsequently disallowed again after a remand from the ITAT for verification. The assessee failed to provide sufficient documentation to substantiate the claims.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee fulfilled the conditions for claiming deductions under Sections 80HHA and 80IA, and whether the assessment proceedings adequately allowed the assessee to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80HHA,Section 80IA,Section 143(3),Section 253(1),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, MP
Before: HON’BLE SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; By the present appeal filed u/s 253(1) of the Income-tax Act,
1961 [‘the Act’] the assessee impugns order dt. 16/03/2018
passed u/s 250 of the Act by Commissioner of Income
Tax(Appeals-1), Jabalpur [‘Ld. CIT(A)’] which sprung out
from order of assessment dt. 10/08/2006 passed 143(3) r.w.s.
254 of the Act by Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle,
Sagar [‘Ld. AO’] anent to assessment year 1992-93 [‘AY’].
ITAT-Jabalpur M/s J P Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT ITA No. 185/JAB/2016 AY: 1992-93
Briefly stated the relevant facts of the case are that;
1 The assessee is a private limi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026