SAGAR MUKESH THAKAR,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be deposited in the Prime Minister National Relief Fund. It directed the Assessing Officer to recalculate capital gains by considering the actual sale price of Rs. 2.5 crores and allowing the cost of acquisition with indexation.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed with a significant delay of 432 days. The delay was attributed to the assessee's AR/CA not informing them about the CIT(A)'s order. The core issue involved the correct sale consideration of land and the subsequent calculation of capital gains.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether capital gains were correctly computed without considering the cost of acquisition and indexation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 250,Section 270A,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Smt. Annapurna Gupta
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��थ� / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु� अपील ( ) / The CIT(A)-(NFAC) 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद /DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad. , , 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ITAT, Ahmedabad
Date of dictation (dictation pad is attached with the file)) : 20.04 2026 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the : 21.04.2026 Dictating Member. 3. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S : 27.04.2026 4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating : Member for pronouncement. 5. Date on which fair order placed before Other Member : 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the : 13.05.2026 Sr.P.S./P.S. 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk. : 13.05.2026 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk. : 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar : for signature on the order. 10. Date of Despatch of the Order :
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026