SMT. VENKATASWAMY REDDY LAKSHMAMMA,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE
What were the facts?
The appeals involved additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Income from House Property and Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) based on a search operation. The assessees were related and involved in a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) for a property.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that capital gains are taxable in the year of executing the JDA, not when the constructed area is handed over. It also held that additions based on uncorroborated loose sheets are not sustainable.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the year of taxability for capital gains arising from a JDA and the validity of additions based on 'dumb documents' found during a search.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year
Smt. Banaswadi Chinnappa Anitha, ITA No. No. 43, Near Canara Bank, 2022-23 2080/Bang/2025 Marathhalli, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AZDPA0033B
Smt. Narayan Vedavathi, No. 43, Near Canara Bank, 2016-17 ITA Nos. 2084 & Marathahalli, & 2085/Bang/2025 Bangalore – 560 037. 2019-20 PAN: ABOPV8677K The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Late Sri N. Venkatesh Reddy, Through L/R Smt. Banaswadi Central Circle – 2(2), Bangalore. Chinnappa Anitha, 2016-17 ITA Nos. 2088 & No. 43, Near Canara Bank, & 2089/Bang/2025 Marathhalli, 2019-20 Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: ACYPR9109D Late Sri Venkataswamy Kodanda Reddy, Through L/R Smt. N. Vedavathi, 2016-17, 2019-20 ITA Nos. 2090 to S/o. Late Venkataswamy & 2092/Bang/2025 Reddy, 2022-23 House No. 696, CKB House, Near Axis Bank, Bangalore – 560 037. PAN: AFMPK4473Q ITA Nos. 2080/Bang/2025 & Others Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year Smt. Venkataswamy Reddy The Deputy Lakshmamma, Commissioner of 2016-17, 2019-20 ITA Nos. 2093 to No. 43,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 45
- Mukesh Mishra, Thane vs ACIT, Circle 1, ThaneITA 5853/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Sip Infotech Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 5355/MUM/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Rajiv Kumar, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle 67(1), DelhiITA 3538/DEL/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 19 1 Mumbai, Mumbai vs Nisha Jhaveri, MumbaiITA 2389/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Arokiaswamy Velumani, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer 15(3)(1), MumbaiITA 1946/MUM/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026