VASUDEVAN MANIMALA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-17(2), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1231/CHNY/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 May 2026AY 2015-164 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, considering the assessee's health issues and reliance on counsel, decided to grant one more opportunity in the interest of natural justice. The appeal was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the delay petition and, if condoned, for adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Vasudevan Manimala, did not file an income tax return. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings under Section 148A and completed the assessment under Section 147 r.w.s 144, assessing income at Rs. 7,56,82,270/-. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed in limine due to a 124-day delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned, and if so, whether the assessment order should be examined on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148A,Section 148,Section 147,Section 144,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: MS. PADMAVATHY.S & SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI

For Respondent: Mr. Gautam S.Mukundan, JCIT

आदेश / O R D E R

PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M:

This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 08.12.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.

ITA No.1231/Chny/2026 Vasudevan Manimala :- 2 -:

2.

The assessee is an individual and did not file the return of income. The A.O received information that the assessee had significant financial transitions. Since the assessee did not file the return of income, the A.O issued a notice u/s. 148A(b) of the Act. Subsequently, the A.O passed an order u/s. 148A(d) of the Act and issued a notice u/s. 148 of the Act on 29.04.2025. The A.O completed the assessment u/s. 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act assessing the income at Rs.7,56,82,270/-. Aggrieved, the assessee filed further appeal before the CIT(A). There was a delay of 124 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A).

3.

We have heard the parties, and perused the material available on record. The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee submitted that the assessee is not aware of the income tax proceedings and completely relied on his counsel for handling the tax matters. The Ld. AR further submitted that the counsel of the assessee did not provide proper professional support and therefore the assessee was not aware that the A.O has passed the assessment order. The Ld. AR also submitted that the assessee was having some health issues due to which he could not concentrate on the tax matters. The ld. AR accordingly prayed for one more opportunity. From the perusal of records, we notice that the assessee has stated the reasons for delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) as part of Form 35 and did not file any separate condonation petition or affidavit explaining the reasons. We further notice that the assessee has filed a medical certificate for undergoing physiotherapy and submitted the same as a reason for the delay which was rejected by the CIT(A). Considering the facts and circumstances unique to the assessee's case, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee in the

ITA No.1231/Chny/2026 Vasudevan Manimala :- 3 -:

interest of natural justice and fair play. Further, lower authorities have not examined the impugned issue on merits since the assessee did not respond to AO's notices and that the CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal in limine. We therefore, remit the appeal back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the delay petition and if the delay is condoned also to consider the impugned issue on merits as well as the legal contentions by calling for necessary details as may be required in order to decide the case in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to file affidavit explaining the reason for delay in filing the appeal along with a condonation petition. The assessee further directed to file any further details as may be called for with regard to the impugned additions made by the AO and cooperate with appellate proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments. It is ordered accordingly.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 13th day of May, 2026 at Chennai.

Sd/- Sd/- (मनु कुमार िग#र) (पदमावती यस) (Manu Kumar Giri) (Padmavathy.S) लेखा सद�य सद�य /Accountant Member �याियक �याियक सद�य �याियक �याियक सद�य सद�य / Judicial Member सद�य लेखा लेखा लेखा सद�य सद�य चे�नई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 13th May, 2026. EDN, Sr. P.S

ITA No.1231/Chny/2026 Vasudevan Manimala :- 4 -:

आदेश क� �ितिल�प अ�े�षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु"/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF

Digitally signed by EJTADA DURGA EJTADA DURGA NARESH NARESH Date: 2026.05.20 12:06:49 +05'30'

More judgments on Section 148A

All 3,543 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →