DEEPENDRA SINGH KAVARETI (SGM),SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SEONI, SEONI

ITA 210/JAB/2025Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur14 May 2026AY 2017-185 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte assessment and appellate orders, remanding the case to the AO for de-novo assessment. This was done because the proceedings were conducted without evidence or submissions from the assessee, and the reasons for non-prosecution were not considered deliberate.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a petrol pump proprietor, failed to comply with notices issued by the AO and the first appellate authority, leading to ex-parte assessment and appeal dismissal. The assessee attributed non-compliance to lack of internet facilities and assistance in a remote village.

What were the issues?

Whether ex-parte assessment and appellate proceedings, conducted due to the assessee's non-compliance, should be set aside and remanded for fresh assessment, considering the reasons for non-compliance.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 250,Section 246A,Section 249

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, MP

Before: HON’BLE SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI

For Appellant: Mr Pavan Ved [‘Ld. AR’]
For Respondent: Mr Rahul Padha [‘Ld. DR’]
Pronounced: 14/05/2026

PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The present appeal is filed by the assessee impugning DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1062492456(1) dt. 12/03/2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’ hereinafter] by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. NFAC’ hereinafter] which in turn dealt with an order of assessment passed u/s 144 of the Act by the Income Tax Officer [‘Ld. ITO’ hereinafter] anent to assessment year 2017-18 [‘AY’ hereinafter].

ITAT-Jabalpur Deependra Singh Kavareti Vs ITO ITA No. 210/JAB/2025 AY: 2017-18

2.

Briefly stated, facts of the case are that; the assessee is a proprietor of M/s Sa

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 142(1)

All 17,244 judgments and leading authorities on Section 142(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →