DEEPENDRA SINGH KAVARETI (SGM),SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER SEONI, SEONI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte assessment and appellate orders, remanding the case to the AO for de-novo assessment. This was done because the proceedings were conducted without evidence or submissions from the assessee, and the reasons for non-prosecution were not considered deliberate.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a petrol pump proprietor, failed to comply with notices issued by the AO and the first appellate authority, leading to ex-parte assessment and appeal dismissal. The assessee attributed non-compliance to lack of internet facilities and assistance in a remote village.
What were the issues?
Whether ex-parte assessment and appellate proceedings, conducted due to the assessee's non-compliance, should be set aside and remanded for fresh assessment, considering the reasons for non-compliance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 250,Section 246A,Section 249
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, MP
Before: HON’BLE SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The present appeal is filed by the assessee impugning DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1062492456(1) dt. 12/03/2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’ hereinafter] by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. NFAC’ hereinafter] which in turn dealt with an order of assessment passed u/s 144 of the Act by the Income Tax Officer [‘Ld. ITO’ hereinafter] anent to assessment year 2017-18 [‘AY’ hereinafter].
ITAT-Jabalpur Deependra Singh Kavareti Vs ITO ITA No. 210/JAB/2025 AY: 2017-18
Briefly stated, facts of the case are that; the assessee is a proprietor of M/s Sa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026