SHUBHAM AGENCIES,INDORE vs. DCIT/ACIT-4(1), INDORE, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the entire exercise of disturbing the year of allowability of expenditure would be revenue neutral as the expenditure was genuine and incurred for business. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents that emphasize the year of taxability of an amount when the expenditure is genuine.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed interest expenses of Rs. 5,20,875/- on loans taken. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 2,37,375/- as excess interest for the period, stating it should be deferred to the next assessment year. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether the excess interest claimed should be disallowed in the current year or allowed in a subsequent year, and whether the disallowance was revenue neutral.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 250,Section 253,Section 36(1)(iii),Section 37(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearingNumber:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082612225
(1) dated 14.11.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned
order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2022-23 and the Shubham Agencies ITA No. 46/Ind/2026 - A.Y.2022-23
corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2021 to 31.03.2022. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an assessment order made u/s 143(3) rws
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026